Skip to content
Software Survivor logo

Antonio Perez · Principal Platform Engineer

Evolve the platform.Keep the business running.

I design adaptable platforms around stable business capabilities so companies can evolve, integrate, and modernize without costly rewrites.

Best suited for business-critical systems where migration, integration, reliability, or vendor risk has become an executive concern. Based in Fresno, working with teams nationwide.

$158.6M+
commerce revenue supported across 2.19M+ orders since September 2020
7 days → ~30 minutes
API onboarding reduced through internal platform tooling
~$19K/month
saved through measured infrastructure optimization

Platform Capabilities That Create Leverage

The work starts with a business capability that must survive change—not a framework preference or a feature list.

Independent technical judgment

Need a decision before committing to implementation?

Start with a focused architecture review, integration audit, or AI workflow assessment. Each produces evidence and a concrete next-step recommendation before a larger budget is committed.

Consulting fit

Best for companies carrying real platform risk.

This is a strong fit when architecture affects revenue, operations, migration risk, engineering leverage, or the ability to change vendors. It is not a fit for commodity brochure sites or technology selection without a defined business capability.

Discuss Your Platform Challenge
  • A platform must change without interrupting the business

    Commerce, operational, or customer workflows need a safer migration or modernization path than a big-bang rewrite.

  • Vendors and integrations are defining the architecture

    Shopify, NetSuite, payments, loyalty, fulfillment, analytics, or cloud constraints are leaking into core business decisions.

  • A lean team needs more engineering leverage

    The team needs clearer boundaries, safer defaults, lower cognitive load, or principal-level support before the next hire or platform investment.

How I think

Architecture should make change less expensive.

These principles guide platform, integration, migration, and reliability decisions under real business and team constraints.

Read the design principles →
  1. Build around business capabilities

    Keep durable business behavior separate from vendors and implementation details.

  2. Optimize for change

    Make the next likely migration, integration, or policy change less expensive.

  3. Optimize for the next engineer

    Make dependencies, ownership, and failure behavior easier to understand.

  4. Prefer practical simplicity

    Choose the least complex architecture the team can operate confidently.

Antonio Perez, Principal Platform Engineer and founder of Software Survivor

Who you'll work with

Antonio Perez, Principal Platform Engineer

Antonio has more than a decade of experience owning commerce, API, integration, data, and cloud platforms. His work includes internal platform tooling that reduced API onboarding from seven days to approximately 30 minutes and architecture leadership across engineering, finance, analytics, fulfillment, and operations.

Selected Architecture Case Study

Keeping pricing, payments, loyalty, fulfillment, analytics, finance, and operations adaptable as the commerce ecosystem changed

Commerce channels and enterprise systems connected through a capability-oriented integration boundary with explicit recovery and reconciliation paths

Designing a Commerce Platform Around Capabilities, Not Vendors

An anonymized architecture case study from commerce platform work that supported 2.19M+ orders and $158.6M+ in revenue since September 2020, showing how capability boundaries, explicit vendor adapters, and recoverable integrations preserved business flexibility.

  • Capability-oriented boundaries for pricing, payments, loyalty, orders, fulfillment, analytics, and finance
  • Stable business-facing APIs and orchestration contracts
  • Vendor-specific adapters for commerce, payment, fulfillment, and enterprise systems
  • Explicit source-of-truth, identifier, and lifecycle ownership

Practical Architecture Writing

Engineering judgment for systems that need to survive changing vendors, technologies, requirements, and engineers.

Bring the platform challenge.

Share the business capability that must change, the systems and vendors involved, and what cannot be interrupted. I will help clarify the architecture, migration path, and smallest responsible next step.

Discuss Your Platform Challenge

I’ll review the context and determine whether a focused engagement, larger implementation, or another option is the most responsible next step.